Under my brilliant management, we're shedding readers and dropping ad revenues ... in the middle of a national election ... at a time when news junkies are gobbling up tons of information and candidates are spending gazillions of dollars ... and let me assure you always critical Freepers ... that ain't easy to do!
1 posted on
10/25/2012 9:21:50 AM PDT by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
Love the smell of face palm in the morning.
2 posted on
10/25/2012 9:23:48 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: abb
Pinch got punched and is in poo ... ping!
3 posted on
10/25/2012 9:26:03 AM PDT by
Zakeet
(Calling the Obozo/Bernack economy sluggish is an insult to slugs)
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; carmenbmw; ...
4 posted on
10/25/2012 9:29:33 AM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Zakeet
Good to hear that the New York Times is following Newsweek’s fine example to going bankrupt....
To: Zakeet
6 posted on
10/25/2012 9:31:07 AM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Zakeet; Revolting cat!
The New York Times Co reported worse-than-expected results on Thursday... Can't always believe what the NY Times reports.
7 posted on
10/25/2012 9:31:44 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
To: Zakeet
8 posted on
10/25/2012 9:36:24 AM PDT by
Scutter
To: Zakeet
I'm stunned that anyone would believe the NYT forecasting any revenue.
10 posted on
10/25/2012 9:37:15 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
To: Zakeet
11 posted on
10/25/2012 9:38:18 AM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Zakeet
The sooner the terminal national abscess called the NYTimes completely dies the sooner America will recover.
12 posted on
10/25/2012 9:40:30 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(The corrupt MSM is the enemy of the American people.)
To: Zakeet
14 posted on
10/25/2012 9:49:24 AM PDT by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Zakeet
Lets see- maybe people want actual NEWS from a supposed news source
These bozos said that Obama won all three debates... Would you PAY for that kind of quality work?
15 posted on
10/25/2012 10:02:13 AM PDT by
Mr. K
("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
To: Zakeet
The owners of the NYT do not need the paper to be profitable in order to make buckets of money out of owning it. The power to manipulate stock prices with news makes it worth the investment.
Get it out of your head that just because the paper is losing money that it will go away.
19 posted on
10/25/2012 10:13:34 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Islam offers us choices: convert or kill, submit or die.)
To: Zakeet
Hence my theory that the MSM was 110% in the tank for Obama because in the near future they are going to be looking for a bailout.
Not looking too promising for them at the moment.
To: Zakeet
Looks like Al Reuters rushed this story out only half-way down the slide. NYT closed today at $8.31 (loss of 21.97% for the day).
ROFLMAO
35 posted on
10/25/2012 1:14:28 PM PDT by
niteowl
(Wisdom comes in two parts: 1) Having a lot to say, and 2) not saying it.)
To: Zakeet
21%? four more days of that, and their Times will be up...
38 posted on
10/25/2012 2:59:11 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Zakeet
NYT’s stock dropped about 22% from the previous day's close.
In dollar terms, the value of the company dropped around $350 million.
From $1.58 billion to around $1.2 billion.
To: Zakeet
They nearly hit their revenue estimate and completely blew their earnings estimate.
They must be giving all the money to Obama.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
