We have a sick soul trying to bully freepers on this very thread, and that popster hasn't the intelligence to assimilate data sufficient to ask the right questions of those it posts to. Youyr comment is more cogent than anythin g the wannabe bully is addressing, and allows me to offer that the drug should not be 'illegal' now when it was legal in the past and became illegal because of 'business interests' which had nothing to do with 'health of the users'.
I'm personally in agreement usually that making things illegal merely pisses up the gene pool with folks who would self-eliminate if allowed to destroy themselves with drugs AND alcohol.
Society has yet to find any balance in the desire to protect the children damaged by parental and relative substance abuses, and the self-regulating of the gene pool. Though the democrats have tried very hard to segregate black people into welfare ghettos for the past fifty plus years, and Republicans have all but ignored the real evils of the 'opposition' party.
The poster is reinforcing the notion held by many that aggressive libertarians are just anal retentive assholes spewing their effluent to try and justify their defiance toward God. It would appear than some of them are also homo activists and ride the libertarian label to exercise their neediness in public.
Need another hankie?
... said the guy girlishly blubbering about "bullying."