Let me help you out.
I have many interests in this fight. The primary one is my own health and that of my children and grandchildren.
Substances that have unnatural DNA, if ingested, will produce cells in my body that have unnatural DNA; there is no way to avoid that, since the nuclei of our cells are fed by the nucleic acid in the substances that we eat.
My second interest in this is that some of my best clients are independant family farms that are presently being directly harmed by GMO crops that intrude into their lands.
This happens in several ways.
First, the GMO crops kill the bees that they must have to pollinate their trees and vines. Bee losses are becoming critical.
Second, the intrusion of the unnatural crops is nearly impossible to control since they are resistant to most commercially available herbicides (that is a major facet of those crops).
Third, and most outrageous, is that Monsanto is favored in the courts, and they actually bring suits against the victims of their invasive plants. Prop 37 will definitely fix this problem, by giving relief in California courts that is not presently available.
Family farms cannot survive without these protections.
Hey, at least you are starting to admit you make money in the anti-GM movement. That is just a self-serving statement about family farms not surviving by being protected...interesting that you believe you can tell the family farmers what products they can use and not use. You don’t want to just have the product labeled, you want to ban the family farmer from using them. This is truly a Marxist mentality....government tells you how to run your business and your life.
That is the most scientifically ignorant comment I've seen on this forum in a long time.
Right up there with the-sun-revolves-around-the-earth crowd.