To: Nachum
Isn’t it getting a little late for an October Surprise? Wouldn’t Obama have done it after he lost miserably in the first debate?
2 posted on
10/21/2012 12:35:16 PM PDT by
Shadow44
To: Shadow44
This is the Obama electoral modus operendi...just ask Jack Ryan... dirty personal destructive politics is Obama’s trading card. He could never win an election based on his marxist ideas so he must denegrate the opponent. Nothing new here..just how much of it the electorate will buy is up for debate, but with the press pushing it you never know.
10 posted on
10/21/2012 12:41:11 PM PDT by
Froggie
To: Shadow44
Allred typically pulls this the Friday before the election. It gets on all the Sunday talk shows but doesn’t allow enough time to get the real story out.
16 posted on
10/21/2012 12:44:24 PM PDT by
Hugin
("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
To: Shadow44
If I were to put on my "devious cap" for a moment, I wouldn't put it past the Obama crew to "let slip" during the debate some momentous news about negotiations with Iran/Libya, etc. Zero would let it out as if a slip of the tongue, and then once the cat was out of the bag, make an "impromptu" full announcement.
A revelation like that, of course, would be huge and completely over-shadow any kind of response by Romney, and throwing the debate completely out of kilter. I know it's a devious thought, but it is the way I now think regarding the most corrupt administration in history.
21 posted on
10/21/2012 12:46:36 PM PDT by
Scooter100
("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
To: Shadow44
Isnt it getting a little late for an October Surprise?If they wait much later it will have to be a November Surprise!
101 posted on
10/21/2012 1:33:20 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(To bid on this tagline space: www.jeffchandlerstaglinespace.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson