[MamaTexan]

Didn't the Raich decision uphold the CC in the case of pot in Cal.?

Yes, they did.

The US Supreme Court also 'found' in Wickard v. Filburn that a man couldn't grow his own wheat on his own land for his and his own family's consumption.

Do you agree with that too?

[count-your-change]

Too bad the poor wheat grower didn't have you to argue his case in court. Anyway, I don't equate wheat growing with pot production.

I take it you don't have much confidence that your opinion or quotation of Marshall would prove to be an effective defense in a drug court. Neither do I when I hear the latest decision on pot and the CC.

You can make all the comments about me you wish here but when it comes down to whether you're willing to put your arguments to a real test, a law court, then suddenly it becomes...what? theoretical? Hot air? the courage of your convictions? what? Just blow?

“Count your sheep” huh?