Then I must assume you don't consider it constitutional for the feds to regulate which, if any, drugs cross the borders. And if not drugs why tobacco and booze? Or beef for that matter?
Nice dodge in changing the subject. A tactic which I notice you attempted to earlier with another Freeper.
-------
And no, it is NOT Constitutional for the feds to regulate anything that crosses the border. They have only a concurrent jurisdiction with the state to collect taxes at the points of entry.
Everything else is under the purview of the States as per the 10th Amendment.
[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.
Samuel Adams (under the pseudonym "Candidus") in the Boston Gazette, 1772
--------
Since you feel free to engage in the game of 'assumption' I'll play along and assume from your reply that indeed you do not care about the Constitution.