Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What this lady writer can’t come out and say is that the NYT started to bury the story once it became clear that Obummer and his minions lied about teh account. Sure, the times had the story front and center as it broke because there wasn’t any reason to believe that the admin was covering something up. But once the stench of cover up and lies wafted into the NYT news room, they went on protection mode for Obama and buried those stories.

The editors and writers of the NY slimes are as intellectually dishonest as they come.


6 posted on 10/21/2012 8:14:23 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (There's a revolution "brewing".....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MAD-AS-HELL
The editors and writers of the NY slimes are as intellectually dishonest as they come.

Unfortunately this is nothing new for "the paper of record," going back at least as far as knowingly hiding Stalin's mass starvation of Ukrainians, and they still refuse to disavow the Pulitzer Prize won by Walter Durante for his lies.

Mark

7 posted on 10/21/2012 8:22:56 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
“How many times do you say the same thing?” I think the answer to that is “frequently” — each time bringing new information to synthesize with what was known before, building the truth block by block...

Hmmm, how many times was "Abu Ghraib" on the front page? They must have been wanting to build their own "truth".

13 posted on 10/21/2012 9:58:58 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson