Replies

“He could have won 60-40, if not better, by merely galvanizing the attention of the American people on what was really an attack on all of us.”

I'm not so sure I agree with this.....there are too many people like me who would vote for dog catcher rather than Obama. He “killed” Osama and the polls were still against him. The attack should not have happened with and, especially without resources to counter it.

“He could have won 60-40, if not better, by merely galvanizing the attention of the American people on what was really an attack on all of us.”

I’m not so sure I agree with this.....there are too many people like me who would vote for dog catcher rather than Obama. He “killed” Osama and the polls were still against him. The attack should not have happened with and, especially without resources to counter it.

OK He could have won 52-48—but won all the same.

Lucky for us, though, he has no capacity for truth, facts, or basic rationality and is a pathological Bolshevik-thinking Muslim apologist and political grifter instead.

Still...

Four more years were right there on the table, and most presidents of our past would have known how to take it. Easy. No problemo.