I am a great fan of Fox. They are less interested in the national security aspects of the story and are driven to further diminish Obama in hopes of getting Romney elected.
A laudable goal. Fox also needs to sell airtime, I do not. National security is more important to me, regarding this story. I think Romney is going to win anyway and piling on with this Libya debacle isn’t justified.
piling on with this Libya debacle isn’t justified
******
To the contrary, there are other significant dimensions to this problem and therefore pressing reasons to get to the bottom of this debacle and do so as quickly as possible. I expect that the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committe if fully aware of and appreciates the gravity of them. Those reasons extend beyond just the matter of arms and it’s not hard to figure out what they are.
For whatever reasons, Fox is doing the nation a service.
It is not FOX News involvement that is important; it is the fact that Chairman McKeon is still pushing this issue and is definitely not backing off. How does that “square” w/what you proposed in your initial post on this thread?
(NOTE: Per above, I do think Catherine Herridge (sp?) does an exemplary job as an investigative journalist. Brett Baer’s report last night on the events leading up to; and inclusive of, the Benghazi attack did a creditable job of summarizing that chronology for those who hadn't been paying attention or who had become confused by the various conflicting reports. Personally, I am still having problems accepting the explanation for how the DSO assigned to accompany Stevens and Smith in the safe room during the attack became separated from them. I think there are some details there that strain credulity.)
V/r,
-Geoff