[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

David Brooks advice to Romney: Don’t ‘nitpick’ on ‘small foreign issue of the past’ Benghazi

Thanks for the reference. Since I have never heard Tucker Carlson arguing from a leftist perspective, I wonder why The Daily Caller would want to print that article, unless they are trying to "present all points of view."

The part of that article on which I agree with you is:

Brooks’ liberal counterpart, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne.....

Up to that point, Poor just quoted the leftist stooges, who are so clueless that their comments do not help their cause. But for Poor to suggest that Brooks is not a "liberal" shows either an appalling lack of knowledge, sloppy writing, or an intention to deceive.

On the other hand, this article by Poor, White House ‘lied’ on Libya because they had ‘the media in their pocket’ hardly presents a leftist point of view.

[LibLieSlayer]

My problem was having a title that is negative for the right and then having to dig several paragraphs into that article to find any minute balance. He seemsto be just a noonan wannabe. Have a great day pal!

LLS

[LibLieSlayer]

My problem was having a title that is negative for the right and then having to dig several paragraphs into that article to find any minute balance. He seems to be just a noonan wannabe. Have a great day pal!

LLS