Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer
There is another pro obama article on FR today that was authored by this poor fellow...

"Another?" I can't find one.

69 posted on 10/20/2012 8:21:54 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

These people would do this country a greater service if they worried less about a binder and more about the irresponsibility, lies and coverup of a terrorist attack that murdered four Americans.


70 posted on 10/20/2012 8:26:26 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2947597/posts

Skip to comments.

David Brooks advice to Romney: Don’t ‘nitpick’ on ‘small foreign issue of the past’ Benghazi

The Daily Caller ^ | 10/20/12 | Jeff Poor

Posted on Saturday, October 20, 2012 5:38:47 AM by markomalley

Call it counter-intuitive, but Mitt Romney shouldn’t focus heavily on what many conservatives are calling President Barack Obama’s biggest foreign policy blunder during Monday night’s upcoming presidential debate, according to New York Times columnist David Brooks.

In his weekly appearance on NPR’s “All Things Considered,” Brooks said the debate, which will be dedicated to the topic of foreign affairs, is an opportunity for Romney to talk about other issues than the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. embassy in Libya.

“Don’t nitpick about Benghazi,” Brooks said. “Don’t have a little argument. Show some of your personality with some vision of America. Use foreign policy to expose your character, rather than getting lost in the weeds of some small foreign issue of the past. That would be my advice to both sides.”

Brooks said debates are more about personality than substance.

“People are not voting on your foreign policy,” he continued. “They’re voting on your personality, so you better expose that through a foreign policy vision.”

Brooks’ liberal counterpart, Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, seemed to agree with Brooks. However, Dionne doubted Romney would resist going after the president on Libya.

“Obama already gave away in an Al Smith Dinner joke that he will mention the words ‘Osama bin Laden,’” Dionne said. “I think Romney will still not resist the chance to finally get his attack on Benghazi right. He’s had two goes at it, and it didn’t work. But I agree with David. I think, for most voters, it’s where are you going to go generally and who are you, because voters don’t expect lots of specificity on events they.....


94 posted on 10/21/2012 3:45:55 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson