Posted on 10/19/2012 9:37:59 PM PDT by Jeff Head
Fox special, "Death and Deceit in Benghazi," to be re-broadcast at 1AM Eastern Time on Fox.
If you can...watch it.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Why would anyone in the world think the U.S. gov had anything to do with making a 3rd rate (and that's being kind) 13 minute Youtube video with dubbed in dialogue? Why would a generalized denial be pointedly repeated a half dozen times or more? It doesn't make sense to me.
That’s my question too. There is not a single document supporting the contention that anyone in the American intelligence community ever made any connection between the video and the attack on the American Embassy in Benghazi. That lie was made from whole cloth. The Administration saw an opportunity to blame it on the video so that it would permit them to once again grovel before the islamic terrorists and justify their complete failure to intervene to repel what is essentially an act of war against America. Obama, Biden, Clinton, Rice and Lamb should all be charged with criminal negligence.
Circulateds your vidlink. Thanx, FRiend.
Ironic I can’t stream it myself! And I wish to hell Fox would unbend and start providing their b/c affiliates with more of their cable content — even as rissoles.
They must have had indications, omens, warnings .... that their deal was about to go sideways. That they went ahead suggests that they had a deniability option in the folder all along -- and they just went to it as soon as the first crow appeared on the telephone wire.
Deep denial, deepest darkest deception. Deepest dishonor.
“....apparently the lurid stuff being passed around about Ambassador Stevens being raped was just nonsense.”
How do you know? Does Fox explicitly deny/debunk it, or did they subject their material to “family suitability” editorial standards that, in days gone by, left lots of stuff on the police blotter and out of the story? I never saw a JFK autopsy photo, for example, until after my 40th b/d. I was 15 when he died.
Can’t stream video/audio, just asking,
“LG”
Sounds right. I just wonder if some political operatives were just sitting around trying to come up with a connection that would not reflect badly on the Obama administration or Islam radicals - so, let’s blame it on an American ‘source’ - say that video that was posted on YouTube!
Every time I think I have become jaded beyond the capacity for surprise or deeper disgust, this administration digs down to a new level of OMFG!
well I did say ‘apparently’. none of the news stories I read
contained any autopsy findings indicating such a thing occurring. I did read one which specifically says that he
was uninjured except for smoke inhalation.
I have examined all of the publicly available videos of the Ambassador’s retrieval and there is an apparent wound near the base of his neck. If it is a gunshot wound, it is most likely a couple of hours post-mortem as there is no blood on his t-shirt. All publicly available photos do not show this apparent wound because the Ambassador’s t-shirt covers the area. I also have a large number of other important video stills and photos that have not been shown in the USA that shed new light on 9-11-12. I do not know how to place them here for discussion. I am working very hard on a video of what I have learned. I will keep you posted. Sorry for the lateness of this post but I was out of country until late last night.
That has been my question, too. Were there any American 'assets' close enough to have arrived in time to do anything? I don't suppose there is any way to find out.
Cordially,
We Americans have nearly a four year history of means and methods of how Obama views US. What to me is bizarre, is how Obama and Hillary set the stage to speak to US and the world after an American Ambassador and three other Americans were brutally slaughtered.
Their response of blaming an unknown video, followed immediately by the need to say repeatedly they, the US government had nothing to do with this video is beyond bizarre.
Who exactly were Obama and Clinton speaking to? It never entered my mind even as they were blaming an 'offensive video', and as much as I am repulsed by the both of them, they would have any connection to the funding, producing of an offensive video. Now neither Obama nor Clinton can say they played no part in the largest most prestigious effort on earth to an advertising and promotion campaign of said 'offensive video'.
All the while we have now learned that both Obama and Clinton knew in real time, as the attack took place there was NO 'video' reaction going on, it was a planned assault.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.