I don’t get the hoopla. So Romney has binders with resumes, why is that a bad thing? Doesn’t that just mean he is considering women for jobs?
Liberals are so ignorant.
Because the morons think Romney was implying he had binders of women for sexual purposes...or something...I think. Actually, it's so stupid you've got to wonder if the people at the Dem campaign headquarters have totally lost their minds with this loser of a strategy.
I have tried to follow this - but can’t. Is this comment being taken by Obama that Romney doesn’t have any women cronies or relatives or daughters of lobbiests to hire - and actually has to look through some resumes?
Or is there something in the term “binder” that is either sexist (like breast or foot binding) or is old-fashioned (’binder’ - Romney can’t use a computer?) Or is it because he has “binders full of women” (how do they all fit in there!?), and not “binders full of women’s resumes”?
Sounds like whoever prepped Biden on his debate has taken over the entire campaign.
“Binder!!!??? HaHaHaHaHa.. Did he say a BINDER!!??? WOW - a BINDER????!!! Come over to my house. HaHaHaHa”