[WashingtonSource]

There’s no evidence whatsoever he was trying to commit arson — so I think you’re taking a leap of faith that defies the facts.

I reiterate that it is also foolish to immediately discount terrorism. I think the circumstantial evidence, in fact, points to terrorism.

[Theoria]

'Sternbeck said the crime Traille is accused of — tossing a glass bottle, with a lit wick and containing a flammable liquid, into the mall food court — was likely not an act of terrorism.

“Right now we don’t believe it’s an act of terrorism,” he said. “It’s more like it’s an act of stupidity.”'

The guy is an idiot and probably had mental issues.

The most destructive part in the article is the reference to our laws : 'Federal charges, which may supersede the local charges, have also been filed'.

Once again the State is subject to the Federal Authority of our country. We have enough laws on the books.