Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nervous Tick

I tend to agree...clearly one of Obama’s flase narratives is that “Al Quida” is defanged because, after all, he killed Osama Bin LAden. This attack destrroys all of that and would leave them doing everything they could to keep it from America.

But that alone does not answer all of the questions leading up to this attack.

Why was Stevens even there? It was the 11th Anniversary of the 911 attacks and 11 is a Holy Number to the Islamics. Particularly when it is clear that Stevens was in fear of his own life? Why was he there? Who sent him there? Why was there no US security supplied for him?

If the false narrative about Al Quida is the answer, the Obama administration would simply have had everyone hunkered down in their embassy trying to avoid anything at all that could intice remaining al quida terrorists. He has an election to win and anything like this would have been an impediment. He would have avoided any chance of an event.

Also, why, after two attacks, very recently, particularly when the one in June blew a 40 ft hole in the wall (which was not repaired), was the small security team removed rom Benghazi? He did not need to do that to advance his narrative.

No, there are these and a number of other very critical questions that do not fit that particular “Occam’s Razor.”

And those questions simply must be answered.


30 posted on 10/19/2012 8:48:56 AM PDT by Jeff Head ( Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

>> No, there are these and a number of other very critical questions that do not fit that particular “Occam’s Razor.”

Well, that could be.

On the other hand, your trail of logic presumes rational thinkers. (e.g. “Why was Stevens left unprotected at such an obviously dangerous time in such a risky place?”)

These people are NOT rational. They are high on “hopium”. They actually BELIEVE that the World Loves Them because they are Better Human Beings Than George Bush, and other such nonsense.

Again, Machivellian conniving *could* explain it... but “stuck on stupid” pretty well explains the whole thing, as well.

Unless more evidence surfaces, I’m going to have to stick with stupid. :-)


35 posted on 10/19/2012 8:58:32 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

And by the way... I’m groovin’ on the fact whether I’m right and the root cause is sheer stupidity... or YOU’RE right and it’s something sinister... either way this situation is a BIG lose-lose for Obama. At a *very* (shall we say) awkward time in his life. :-)

I’m just sorry that American lives were lost, needlessly. THAT I am NOT groovin’ on.


41 posted on 10/19/2012 9:08:55 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson