Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker

Exactly! We should not have intervened when Saddam went after Saudi Arabia. Let them kill each other; I don’t see the problem. As for Saddam controlling more oil, he still is going to sell it. Why we got ourselves entangled in defending Muslims anywhere is beyond me.


15 posted on 10/18/2012 11:27:59 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX

We went after Saddam because he broke his deal with us.Kuwait was more or less a protectorate of ours. It was, of course, a creation of the Brits and ought to have belonged to Iraq all along. But Saddam got greedy after his war with Iran led to no gain.


17 posted on 10/19/2012 9:28:41 AM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson