I am not so sure that it is party first as much as reality first. I don’t much care for Myth Romney as a candidate, he sure as hell isn’t a conservative; but right now the realistic choices are between Myth and the Obunghole. I know which way I have to go.
In my perfect world the Tea Party would have organized just enough at the national level (keeping the independence at the local level) to advance a national candidate we could all agree upon and vote for in good conscience. A candidate that was chosen for conservative values, like a Reagan or perhaps a Palin, at least some body who held our same values even if we didn’t agree in all respects.
Perfectly said
We got what we got..
Two choices.. The inventor of Romney-care OR the inventor of Obama-care..
One or the other.. no other choice..
1) Not voting is a vote for Obama.. as is actually voting for him...
2) voting for Zero is worth two votes...
Except not voting robs Romney of a vote and makes someones else’s vote for Obama double important(worth two votes)..
So if you do not vote you’re voting FOR OBAMA... anyway..
ONLY a vote for Romney is a vote against Obama..
Like it or not.. No apples plus no apples equals NO APPLES..
Quite simple really..