Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: chessplayer
I’m sure this is important to the average voter.
2 posted on
10/18/2012 9:37:35 AM PDT by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: chessplayer
Stinking Democrat liars.
He meant binders full of the resumes of women who had applied to work in his administration, many of whom he hired and gave good fair salaries to.
Unlike our current federal administration which hires a few token women at less money than the tax cheat loud mouth men it hires.
3 posted on
10/18/2012 9:39:26 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: chessplayer
I don’t know what the big deal is here. I used to be a supervisor and was involved in hiring. HR would send me a pile of resumes. What’s the difference? That I didn’t have them in a binder?
4 posted on
10/18/2012 9:40:22 AM PDT by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: chessplayer
TV press monkeys continue to make fools of themselves.
In other news, Ambassador Stevens is still dead.
5 posted on
10/18/2012 9:41:11 AM PDT by
marron
To: chessplayer
Binders and Big Bird? That’s it....that’s all you got?
6 posted on
10/18/2012 9:41:59 AM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: chessplayer
What am I missing. Headhunters, consultants, college recruiters, etc. all have binders full of resumes categorized by desirable traits.
7 posted on
10/18/2012 9:43:18 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: chessplayer
Unlike Obama who hired a handful of female marxist cronies he’s known for years.
8 posted on
10/18/2012 9:44:26 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: chessplayer
Does NBC actually think women are that stupid? This is a desperate attempt to pander to women and it’s going to backfire.
To: chessplayer
This is so stupid, it's beyond belief.
The 2nd debate was another fiasco for Zero because of Crowleygate, and this is the only thin reed the Dems can pull from it: a revival of the silly “war on women.”
10 posted on
10/18/2012 9:45:11 AM PDT by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: chessplayer
Dear God Please let people see that someone who is too stupid to understand what ‘binder’ is and somehow thinks it means “women tied up” are too stupid to vote and afflict them with a stomach or intestinal disorder that keeps them home from voting... they can be cured the next day, that’s aOK
Amen
11 posted on
10/18/2012 9:46:46 AM PDT by
Mr. K
("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
To: chessplayer
Maybe the people at NBC think that “binders full of women” is a code word for porn?
If they do, they have sick minds.
To: chessplayer
“Binders full of women” is way more important than Obama lies about energy or Benghazi IMO. /s
To: chessplayer
Minitru just wants something else to report on than Benghazi. They’ll latch onto anything, no matter how small, trivial or stupid (especially stupid!).
15 posted on
10/18/2012 9:51:56 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: chessplayer
The sick irony is that this meme comes from
supporters of SLAVERY. The DNC supports
countries that “own” SLAVES.
THAT is why they make a big deal about women’s
names in binders. To try to divert.
18 posted on
10/18/2012 9:55:22 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: chessplayer
Okay, hopefully I can get the words in my head to page in an articulate manner. I am a woman, and usually when I hear the leftest drivel on the “war on women” I may not agree with it, but I usually understand the “angle” and see how it might influence the squishy middle. BUT, I do NOT even get the angle with this binder crap. Not only do I not see it as offensive, I think it is SO ludicrous as to piss off the middle. Can someone PLEASE explain to me what is offensive in this comment from the lefts POV???? Seriously scratching me head!
19 posted on
10/18/2012 10:00:49 AM PDT by
Anti-Hillary
(Barry, Barry quite contrary, how does your government grow?...)
To: chessplayer
NBC is the Democrat megaphone through which its cheerleaders root for the home team. Any resemblance to an actual news media organization is simply a matter of wearing the uniforms and acting the parts.
As for Mika Brzezinski, it is common knowledge how and why she got her job, and even those who do not know can assume as much simply by observing the gaping distance between her talents and the demands of mere adequacy.
20 posted on
10/18/2012 10:02:09 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
To: chessplayer
"NBC: Romney's 'Binders' Comment Shows He 'Doesn't Have Any Leg to Stand On' With Women"
Except the legs of all the women who have worked with him, and who have stepped forward in support of him. This is almost as bad as Matthews asking if challenging Obama is unconstitutional. These people are demented and deranged.
21 posted on
10/18/2012 10:03:12 AM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: chessplayer
We have a consulate over run and 4 dead including an ambassador because this administration took security away and they are talking about Romney not being worthy because of Binders of women????.
Life can not get any more bizarre in liberal media land. They have become Monty Python America.
To: chessplayer
To: chessplayer
“Doesn’t have a leg to stand on” is offensive.
My grandfather lost his leg in WWII.
I demand that NBC apologize for their insensitivity.
24 posted on
10/18/2012 10:03:40 AM PDT by
Noamie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson