I’m referring to his contention that he did not realize that being “engaged” while still married would be frowned upon in the milieu in which he operates. This is an intelligent and educated man; I’ve been reading his stuff since the 80s. He’s been active in evangelical/nondenominational Christianity for decades. Either he is being deliberately obtuse, or he’s so befuddled by the new young romance that his common sense went missing.
Thanks.
But my honest question remains: How would you have responded?
Please explain what you would have said and how, or are you suggesting he should not have responded at all?
Thanks.
Where does he say he’s engaged? In one thread (or report on a thread), he said specifically that he was not having an affair, and he was not engaged to this lady! This is in a recent article from Oct. 17th! He said that some writer gave that impression, and it was false! He said that the writer said that he introduced her as his fiance, and she wasn’t? I’m honestly confused! Unless he suddenly turned around and admitted it today?