Posted on 10/17/2012 5:35:04 PM PDT by Kaslin
They are pretending to be upset with "a binder full of women"? Really?
"Hey! Women of America... Did you hear what he said? He said, "a binder full of women"! That really upsets you, right? Right ?? "
From what I am gathering among my FB friends - “binders of women” is terribly offensive. It reduces women to objects that can be placed in binders.
Clearly, Mitt’s hatred for all women was exposed for everyone to see.
According to Eva Longoria, Jessica Alba, and Code Pink...women are much happier when we are reduced to vaginas.
When I got married I told my husband he had to get rid of his binders full of women
I’m a binder kind of gal myself - I keep all of my paperwork in binders, too. Even my financial records are kept in binders. Today a bill collector called, and I told him to hold so that I could get my binder.
I guess only a Democrat could possibly find the word “binder” offensive.
This is a comment from a Facebook friend in response to one of the many hysterical posts today about the binders:
“My jaw literally dropped open when he said that... The whole answer was a scary glimpse into his very Stepford soul.”
Really?! The drama and hysteria over this is so silly and absurd. Romney was clearly talking about the impressive amount of qualified resumes from women... How do the libs so grossly distort that and interpret it so literally?!
They do because they are stupid an ignorant
All this hysteria is just another reminder of how ridiculous the other side is... and also how they all seem to be very familiar with the alternate meanings of otherwise-innocuous terms (like tea bag). We all should just sit back and laugh at them for the clowns they really are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.