Mitt Romney can and will revisit Benghazi this coming Monday’s debate which is billed as being devoted to foreign policy. So, let not your heart be troubled
The whole thing was a set up between Crowley and the Obama campaign.
Tragically, Romney took the only bad path possible: jumping on the word “terror.”
Think how much differently this day would have been had Romney gone down the Susan Rice path a week later etc etc. Downballot Dems would be abandoning Obama and his money would dry up.
It is tragic and heartbreaking because the forces of Satan really pulled out a dirty win. I am sure that Mitt will remedy this error on Monday night.
My heart is troubled that Romney reportedly never brought the argument up today. I can only presume that he has hopes that the media, our media, keeps this issue alive, because taking his lead today appears he not only cedes the point to buhrock obama, but has dropped the subject. This helps buhrock shelve his lie.
State intel certainly never classified this tragic event as a protest, or connected to a video. The NSA must be a box of rocks to not inform Obama of the same intel take as State.
This won’t go away, but hope you’re right that Romney gets his attack in place in time for the debate.
I certainly hope you are right. Obama wants the Benghazi security issue and the days and days of “video protest” issue to go away. Romney was mum post debate. That helps buhrock.
The media will cool on this story, willingly, if it is not persued by the people and the Romney campaign itself. We need Jeff Chavitz to keep the heat on this rhetorically, from Congress, to hope for coverage.