Crowley Backtracks on Her Backtrack

Newsbusters ^

[originalbuckeye]

Crowley.....has.....lost.....ALL.....credibility. I hope CNN recognizes that fact.

[HerrBlucher]

What she did was Baracktrack.

[skeeter]

Moderator Candy Crowley tap dances almost as well as President Candy Ass.

[Cincinatus]

I hope CNN recognizes that fact.

CNN recognizes the fact the she has served The Master. That's enough to insure her job security, if not a raise.

[dforest]

You see, this is why the original rules were made that Crowley decided she would change on debate eve.

The rules were made and agreed to when the debate was set up.

Crowley has become a 1st class liar because she decided she alone would change the rules in order to pull Obama over the finish line.

Sorry Candy, you are an epic FAIL.

[miserare]

Crowley will be persona non grata everywhere but MSNBC.

She took bullet for her man Obama, and at the same time, ended her mediocre career as a journalist.

[nhwingut]

The media is deliberately editing that tape in the Rose garden. They cut off what led into Obama saying “no acts of terror.” It was a throw away line following up on the anniversary of 9/11 etc.

And then he moved into Libya. The ‘acts of terror’ had nothing to do Libya.

[ari-freedom]

The POINT is that Obama said it was
about the video
about the video
about the video.

[patriotsoul]

I thought it was a bump in the road

[PhiloBedo]

I think she should replace Helen Thomas as the fugly poster hag.

[mass55th]

"Crowley backtracks..."

Will she backtrack to September 30th, when she interviewed Axelrod?

Crowley On September 30th: Administration Took Weeks To Admit Benghazi Might Be A Terrorist Attack

[MotorCityBuck]

Was there a loud, piercing, continual beeping sound as She backed up? Ya know, like a garbage truck?

[SC_Pete]

Selected questions, practiced theatrics, and the Benghazi gothcha all reek of Chicago politics. What we witnessed may very well have been criminal.

[Brooklyn Attitude]

Crowly you dummy, mentioning the word terror in passing is not the same as calling the embassy attack an ACT OF TERROR. In fact the regime went out of their way for weeks DENYING this was a terrorist attack.

[SERKIT]

[zencycler]

We shouldn't be challenging what Obama claims he said on Sept 12th - We should be accepting that he called it an "act of terror" on Sept 12th, and then challenging him to defend the two weeks that followed - challenge the fact that he and his administration, knowing that this was in fact a terrorist attack, chose to spend two weeks denouncing the video instead of denouncing the terrorism:

See the link for an effective example of this:

Obama's Benghazi Lies

[mancini]

She’s the heifer of heifers. You’re the best at being something, Candy!

[bramps]

Did anyone expect any different from this moderator? The next one is going to be the end all of end all moderator bias you're ever going to see. The line up of moderators is what set me off in the first place. Lehrer was fair, if not weak, Candy stepped it up a little for their fair haired Obama, Shieffer will be positively obnoxious. Bet on it. Romney better bring his meanest game he's ever been and jump all over Obama’s lies and misquotes and all such bs without giving in to the moderator's attempt to stop him.
You know, doesn't Obama remind you of Pinocchio without the nose. Especially the ears!!! Perfect fit.

[chris37]

Good God that is hilarious :D