Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: diamond6

Thanks for your advice and link.. Here is my email;

Candy’s intentional defiance regarding the rules of engagement in the debate, was clearly a precursor of her intentions to disrupt the flow of this important event.. Someone should have taken action before it was allowed to happen..

The unabashed bias that she displayed in her actions during the most important interactions of this Presidential campaign was clearly intentional, and inexcusable..

This incident clearly casts doubt on your leaderships in matter, and your network in particular, and it’s ongoing credibility..

I still hold out some hope that your subsequent actions regarding her tenure at your network can redeem, and hopefully reestablish your noted impartiality in being trusted to report the unvarnished news.. I guess we will see how long it will take for leadership to do what is necessary!


38 posted on 10/17/2012 3:14:55 PM PDT by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: carlo3b

Good job... good email.


42 posted on 10/17/2012 8:09:31 PM PDT by diamond6 (Freerepublic.com and Hillbuzz.org are my go to sites for conservative news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson