VIDEO: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/10/16/Crowley-Takes-Obamas-Side-In-Dispute-During-Debate
I forgot to post the video of the Libya part...sorry.
She really sandbagged Romney. ALmost like it was coordinated. Just as the question which gave Obama the opportunity to mention the 47 thing when Romney couldn’t respond. Romney knew he’d do it which is why he mentioned it prior to Obama. Crowley sucked big time.
...it was....but because of the internet, that lie will be exposed by noon tomorrow and people will see the collaboration. TRhat alone will give Romney more points this week
The 47 percent comment failed badly..on CNN they had a graph which showed the response from people who were watching the debate, the second Obama mentioned the 47 percent he flat lined..people are sick and tired about hearing about the 47 percent..most people with a brain understand what Romney meant and agree with him
It was a sham....every question was from someone religious or racial minority lib and the questions were soft balls for Obama
except one apparently non liberal Jewish exception and God bless him...Mr Epstein who asked about Libya..he deserves MVP for tonight
does anyone think anyone is really undecided right now?
that one black dude seemed shaky for Obama
one thing...except for Epstein they were all about “What can the government do for me..as a woman...as a latino etc?”
and people like that are not libs or undecided?
i ain’t buying it
that slattern Crowley should be ashamed
I took it to be a planned signal when Obama said to Crowley, “I’m happy to have an extended discussion...” (or something to that effect) and Crowley immediately responded with, “I want to move you along” and went on to another question.
Or was she provided with a transcript by the Obama campaign in advance of the debate.
Was this a set up?
Obama planned to say that he called it a terrorist attack on the 12th and Crowley was "prepped" to support that lie?
In fact, didn't Obama point at Crowley and say, "read the transcript?"