To: Clint N. Suhks
“We removed the information from the website because we do not wish to participate in a theological debate about something that has become politicized during this campaign.”
Makes good sense
2 posted on
10/16/2012 2:05:08 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
There would be nothing wrong with Billy saying he and Mormons agree to disagree about deep issues of theology. That’s obvious. It’s the relatively modern term “cult” that is the flash point. But to many this concession will make the BGEA look weak. Keeping track of “cults” is a Baptist thing and, God bless the Baptists (I visit one of their churches now, and it is wonderful), they could sometimes use discretion in how they formulate their battles. Not implicitly tagging certain groups of unbelievers as worse avoids having to correct that impression later.
12 posted on
10/16/2012 2:23:38 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
To: driftdiver; All
From the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association:
We removed the information from the website because we do not wish to participate in a theological debate about something that has become politicized during this campaign.What a lame of lamest compromising cop-outs.
And for the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association's "next" trick, they will:
(a) Remove all statements promoting one-man, one-woman marriage because they don't want to participate in a theological debate about something that has become politicized not only during this campaign but 24/7 by homosexual activists...iow...they will remove such statements in perpetuity.
(b) Remove all statements linked to Biblical gender distinctiveness, because they don't want to participate in theological debates about something that has become politicized by Democrats (especially feminists and gender-benders)
To: driftdiver
.
Yep ...
"Makes Good Sense ..."
I can just imagine Moses, Joshua, Eijah, John the Baptist ...
and Jesus Christ Himself ...
"softening" their criticisms of the "spiritual blasphemys" of their own day ...
just to not offend the pagan Eqyptians, Amelekites and Romans ...
Like I stated the other day ...
As much as I respect him ... Rev.Billy Grahamn "sold-out" when he gave Myth Romney his quasi-endorsement ...
Just wondering ... with all due respect (of course) ...
exactly what Myth offered as his "thirty pieces of silver" ?
You know, it says in the Scriptures that, except with the Holy Spirit's help ...
"even the very elect would be decieved by the anti-christ ..."
I've now ... for the first time in my life ... seen that actually happen ...
with Billy Grahmn's endorsement of "Myth Romney" ...
"Myth Romney" the self-proclaimed Celestial God-Child from the "Severely Conservative" MORMON planet Kolob ... located in the Constellation Cancer ...
"Myth Romney" who worships (as a god) the same Joseph Smith who called himself the "Second Mohammed" ...
whose proclaimed goal was the VIOLENT destruction of the American Christian church ...
and the OVERTHROW of the U.S. Constitutional Republic ...
with a MORMON THEOCRACY ...
Has Rev. Billy Grahamn just effectively ended his "spiritual career" in the same SHAMEFUL manner as Penn State football coach Joe Paterno ?
I say "yes" ...
.
43 posted on
10/16/2012 3:37:03 PM PDT by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
To: driftdiver
It does make sense but wasn't doesn't is - where is
Islam in this list?
"Some of these groups are Jehovah's Witnesess, Mormons, the Unification Church, Unitarians, Spritualists, Scientologists, and others," the site continued. Was it on Graham's site before or did CNN deliberately leave it off?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson