Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPJ

It’s ridiculous to even call this a townhall debate. The only legitimate way to refer to it as such would be if Crowley were choosing the questions randomly. She is not.

This is the “Candy Crowley gets to choose whatever questions she wants to ask” debate. It will therefore be just as biased as they all are - perhaps she is intelligent enought to cleverly masquerade her bias, but biased it will be.


56 posted on 10/16/2012 9:43:20 AM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: PAR
It’s ridiculous to even call this a townhall debate. The only legitimate way to refer to it as such would be if Crowley were choosing the questions randomly. She is not.

This is the “Candy Crowley gets to choose whatever questions she wants to ask” debate.< It will therefore be just as biased as they all are - perhaps she is intelligent enough to cleverly masquerade her bias, but biased it will be.

You're right on all of this Par. But if WE want to maintain our credibility we must stop participating in these scams.

You're also right that this is NOT a town hall debate - it IS a “Candy Crowley gets to choose whatever questions she wants to ask” debate. Shame on CNN for pushing this fraud, shame on the 'commission', and finally shame on us for going along with it.

63 posted on 10/16/2012 10:08:49 AM PDT by GOPJ (Candy picks ALL questions to ask from the hundreds submitted - Citizens are stage props.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson