Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: US Navy Vet; unkus; Forty-Niner; Todd Kinsey; flat; ZULU; bitt; onyx; nutmeg; MamaDearest; ...

Why did the GOP schmucks agree to all these Liberal hack moderators????


80 posted on 10/15/2012 9:12:06 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExTexasRedhead
Because the onus is on the challenger to prove he or she is a better alternative. Anyway, that's the answer you will usually get.

In reality, if the incumbent is a Republican, they are still in the role of the challenger. See Bush in 2004. Conventional wisdom at the time was that he would lose with the large number of undecideds because the undecideds always break for the challenger.

It didn't happen in 2004 for one reason only: Bush was perceived as the challenger because the media were lined up so solidly behind John Kerry.

112 posted on 10/15/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Why did the GOP schmucks agree to all these Liberal hack moderators????

I can only guess but they are ALL part of this corrupt "Two-Party Cartel". No 3rd party candidates can get traction because they are forced out by this oligarchy.

117 posted on 10/15/2012 10:06:41 AM PDT by Digger (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson