Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carriage_hill
No. It's a matter of conservation of energy. The skydiver had potential energy (height above ground) but not much kinetic energy (started from essentially zero velocity). Returning from orbit, a spacecraft has more potential energy (higher altitude and greater mass) and a heckuva lot more kinetic energy (orbital velocity). Both “burn off” that energy returning to the Earth, but the spacecraft has a lot more to get rid of than the skydiver.
41 posted on 10/15/2012 10:46:21 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: chimera; sloop

That makes sense.

Don’t shuttles travel at something like 15,000-24,000 mph in space? That’s coming-in pretty “hot”... don’t they turn ‘em around and do a burn to slow down?


44 posted on 10/15/2012 10:56:33 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (The 0bummer Penguin: I played this country like a harp from hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson