They put that up on the 28th, from a story in the times published on the 14th. Which means, that we have been dealing arms to backdoor funnel arms to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood rebels.
All of which gives credence to the notion that Ambassador Stevens was dealing weapons deals with Libyans in Benghazi- and then they must have decided to kill him....
Now, if the administration was illegally dealing in arms with the 3rd world, it is very convenient that their dealer got killed. Convenient indeed.
why did they decide to kill him? He was arming non-al quaida and al quaida decided to kill him?