[Alex Murphy]

I have read some really ******** Post in Free Republic, but this one takes the cake. Since when is it anyone’s business what kind of underwear Mrs. Romney wears? Or for that matter whether or not she wears any at all.

It's similar to discussing why Catholics should (or shouldn't) wear a scapular - it's not about the article of clothing per se, but about whether the presence/absence of the article is indicative of devotion and obedience to the religion.

Knowing the design and instructions regarding the sacred undergarments, questions arose concerning her faithfulness since her outer clothing that night should have revealed them.

[Venturer]

I guess she just cannot win with the turkeys who are determined to make a case against her. Had she worn them they would have made a big deal of her panty lines.

It’s funny they think Wide Load is the height of fashion with her Boob belts and crazy colored shoes.

[antisocial]

“Knowing the design and instructions regarding the sacred undergarments, questions arose concerning her faithfulness since her outer clothing that night should have revealed them.”

Why are you so concerned with her faithfulness? She is not running for political office. Maybe you should be a little more concerned with the Moslem in the oval office.

[hinckley buzzard]

questions arose concerning her faithfulness

In the LAT? That's a lying sack of sh*t and you know it.