It’s obvious that this is not just about incompetence - something big is being covered up.
The questions are, 1) What was Stevens doing in Benghazi, 2) Who was he supposed to meet, 3) Was “no security” part of the arrangement for the meeting(s), and, of course 4) Who sent him?
The payoff for whatever he was doing there must have been big enough to justify the risk. What do you suppose it was?
“The payoff for whatever he was doing there must have been big enough to justify the risk. “
This is something that has been nagging at me. What was this guy doing there (assuming he’s not a moron)?
IMHO, the "Fast and Furious" of the Middle East...letting guns fall into the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood.