Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Author Ed Klein: As Benghazi blame nears Hillary, Clintons grow furious
Daily caller ^ | 10/12/2012 | Alex Pappas

Posted on 10/13/2012 1:26:48 AM PDT by TigerClaws

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Cindy of Nashville

His answer would be the State Department of course. Cue sounds of wheels grinding Hillary to a grease spot.


41 posted on 10/13/2012 4:21:44 AM PDT by gotribe (He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Hillary has always said that we have to sacrifice for the good of all. Now this is her chance!


42 posted on 10/13/2012 4:27:01 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (ma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
All we need now is for an al qaeda overthrow of the US/Libyan government, increasingly likely and possible. Al Qaeda is again flourishing - that's what Romney should point out time and time again. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/obamas-libya-debacle-willful-blindness/2012/10/12/14d69f04-146f-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_blog.html
43 posted on 10/13/2012 4:28:44 AM PDT by gotribe (He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Yep, called this one as soon as I saw the column on Hillary's State Dept Conference call. You could read the back story on that one as if it was in letters the size of the Hollywood sign.

Hillary was firing a shot over the bow of the SS Barry Hussein. She realized the music had stopped and she was the one without a chair.

44 posted on 10/13/2012 4:33:00 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws


45 posted on 10/13/2012 4:36:53 AM PDT by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I hope she’s kept a real good paper trail of the whole situation.


46 posted on 10/13/2012 4:37:14 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

We Came WE Saw He Died
I bet cackling Hillary wishes she had never made that statement


47 posted on 10/13/2012 4:43:41 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

So will Hillary go down without a fight to save the fortunes of a bumbling, stupid Obama...
A man she and her husband despise?



<>

48 posted on 10/13/2012 4:46:10 AM PDT by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

No one seems to be considering the possibility that it is Obama who has the goods on Hillary AND Bill.

The executive branch is clearly attempting to isolate the State Department. In the world we think we live in, this would be extremely dangerous for Obama.

Unless he is the one who holds the trump cards.

Both Clintons have been doing Obama’s bidding for some time now, with severe potential consequences to their reputations.

Bill’s endorsement of Obama at the Dem convention was strange. Most of us have attempted to explain it by saying there was something Obama would eventually do for Bill and/or Hillary. Isn’t it possible Bill’s endorsement was coerced?

So far, it seems as if the Clintons are taking their medicine. It would be devastating to Obama’s reelection chances if Bill withdrew his endorsement. Obama is acting as if he knows beyond a shadow of doubt he won’t.

We’ll see.


49 posted on 10/13/2012 4:46:10 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
It will be interesting to see which side the press takes on this - Obama or Hillary?

The same side they took in the 2008 primary

And the Clintons know it

50 posted on 10/13/2012 4:47:14 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

They have already done that. They said embassy security was delegated to State.


51 posted on 10/13/2012 4:51:14 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

They’re eating thier own, he he he he he he he..............


52 posted on 10/13/2012 4:52:04 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (bb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
bill to obama: I brought you into this office and I can take you out.

NOPE--Obama and the Chicago thugs handed the Clintons their asses in the 08 primary and they know it and have been good little boys since then

With the MSM behind Obama the Clintons don't stand a chance
53 posted on 10/13/2012 4:52:13 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

What ever happened to Hillary’s massive debt when running for President? Some people believe a deal was worked out with ObaMA to pay off the Hillary Clinton debt. ThaT would explain why Billy Boy Clinton is running around the country campaigning for Barry and Joey.


54 posted on 10/13/2012 4:53:28 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

“I am placing my bets on for a Clinton win.”

Interesting. The Clinton Mafia vs. The Chicago Thug Machine. Heads will roll ... literally, probably.


55 posted on 10/13/2012 4:53:37 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
The MSM will cover for both sides

This massive fight between Obama and the Clintons is a Pipe Dream

Clintons ain't taking on Obama --Black vote will see to that
56 posted on 10/13/2012 4:56:12 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Who would somone believe, Hillary or Obama? Was it bad intelligence? They were all over Bush when he fell for bad intelligence. Now, Hillary and Obama contradict each other.
Biden has put some gasoline on the fire.


57 posted on 10/13/2012 4:58:01 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

The clintons ARE Chicago. Long before obie ever stepped foot there. Their connections are his connections and have ALWAYS been their connections. bill and hill is a mafia style marriage to connect the bubba and Chicago factions...and they have stayed connected ever since.


58 posted on 10/13/2012 5:03:00 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Plus he doesn;t want the blacks against him.


59 posted on 10/13/2012 5:06:24 AM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

“No one seems to be considering the possibility that it is Obama who has the goods on Hillary AND Bill.”

Double edged sword. They have the goods on EACH OTHER.


60 posted on 10/13/2012 5:12:01 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson