[montanajoe]

He’s right there is no difference both are liberals...

[C. Edmund Wright]

........here’s your sign...............

[C. Edmund Wright]

Who is doing your scoring? The BLS?

[MNJohnnie]

He is the problem the Libertarians/Ron Paul crowd always have. They are so busy arguing their political theology they lose any contact with practical political reality.

Romney or Obama will be the next President. Romney is a pragmatic business man. We will have to work daily to keep his feet to the fire but he will listen to us. Obama is a fevered far Leftist ideologue who will work tirelessly against us.

If Obama is reelected by 2016 we will be so far over the fiscal cliff there will be no climbing back. Romney sees the chart below as a problem. 0bama thinks the problem is we have not spent enough!

FY 1992-1993 Bush 1 and Dem Congress. FY 1994-95 Clinton and a Dem Congress. FY 1996-2001 Clinton and a GOP Congress. FY 2002-2003 Bush 2 and GOP House/Dem Senate. FY 2004-2007 Bush and a GOP Congress. FY 2008-2011 Obama and Dem Congress. FY 2012+ Obama/GOP House/Dem Senate.

Obama added planks favoring Gay Marriage and taxpayer funded abortion on demand up to birth to the 2012 Democrat Party platform.

By contrast the 2012 GOP platform is the most Conservative one in their history.

No matter how much one might hate Romney, no one with a brain would refuse to see the stark difference between Romney and Obama on both fiscal and social issues.

With Romney Fiscal and Social Conservatives have a seat at the table, while Obama will actively promote everything real Conservatives are against.

By 2016 everything Conservatives claim to be so passionate about will be legislated. As Roe V Wade should of taught Conservatives once something is legislated it become almost impossible to undo.

Once 2016 rolls around the Judiciary will be so packed with Obamabots anything Conservatives DID manage to legislate would simply be undone by Judicial Fiat.

If Obama is reelected there will be nothing left to win.

After another 4 year term of Obama the USA will be a European style 1 party state with a state directed media, that will allow just enough political window dressing from a “loyal opposition” to keep their peon classes passive.

And those around here who feel their political sour grapes from the 2012 GOP Primaries are more important then the future of our country will have been the active allies of that destruction

[Erik Latranyi]

He’s right there is no difference both are liberals...

....and Ron Paul supporters cut their own noses off despite their faces.

[okie01]

Ron Paul Won't Endorse Romney, Sees "Essentially No Difference"

Then, Ron Paul is blind as a mole.

And, as usual, Paul is more concerned with his favorite passtime -- pissing in the Republican soup -- than in advancing the country's interests.

He's a little man. More Jimmy Carter than libertarian giant.

[MNJohnnie]

This is the great thing about you Ron Paul supporters.

Once we pin you down with the facts, you always resort back to your emotion based drivel. The Paul crowd, and the Left, share that character flaw. You assume emotion based drivel screamed at volume make up for a complete lack of reason and fact.

The veneer of reason the Paul crowd affects is about a millimeter thick.

[Servant of the Cross]

A little L Ron history of POTUS endorsements ...

Paul will give his seal of approval to four candidates: Green Party nominee Cynthia McKinney, Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr, independent candidate Ralph Nader and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin.

And alliances .....

LRon Paul Wants Kucinich In His Cabinet

Nader, who has recently called this progressive-liberaltarian coalition "the most exciting new political dynamic" in the US today …….. "I believe in coalitions," Rep. Paul echoed.

And LRon has got his own endorsement .....

maher would vote for LRon

I am so glad this boil on the butt of the GOP has run his last race.