Check out this blog by Dan Fredrick at: http://www.colony14.net/id668.html
(Oct. 1, 2012) As I noted in the introduction to my book, The Obama Timeline, a jury at a murder trial will often find the accumulated circumstantial evidence so overwhelming that a guilty verdict is obviouseven though there may be no witness to the crime. The jurors in the Scott Peterson trial believed the collection of evidence more than they believed Scott Peterson. Among other things, the jury thought that being arrested with $15,000 in cash, recently-dyed hair, a newly-grown goatee, four cell phones, camping equipment, a map to a new girlfriends house, a gun, and his brothers drivers license certainly did not paint a picture of a grieving husband who had nothing to do with his pregnant wifes disappearance and murder.
In the four years I have been gathering information aboutand evidence againstBarack Hussein Obama, I have encountered hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing. None of those coincidences, by themselves, may mean much. But taken as a whole it is almost impossible to believe they were all the result of chance. Consider the Obama-related coincidences: (click on the above link for some real eye openers you may not know about)
Just wow !