[DiogenesLamp]

Wrong. The husband was trespassing with intent to at least confront the other man. The husband initiated the attack.

Game over.

Maybe so, but does it occur to anyone that a man who is knowingly sleeping with another man's wife ought to get his a$$ beaten?

There was a time when the legal system enforced adultery laws. Unless I am mistaken, somewhere in the Bible it mentions that it is the duty of the rulers to punish murderers so that the family of the victims will not feel compelled to seek out justice themselves.

I would argue that the same logic ought to apply for adultery. Of course we are a long way from where we used to be as a nation.

The legal system; So full of technicalities and so void of justice.

[Dead Corpse]

Maybe so, but does it occur to anyone that a man who is knowingly sleeping with another man's wife ought to get his a$$ beaten?

Of course he should have. Leather gauntlet across the face, choose your seconds, see you at dawn...

That doesn't happen any more. Much to our societal detriment IMO.

[Jim Noble]

I agree completely, and I’m surprised so few “conservatives” get it.

You f*** another man’s wife, you commit extreme provocation. It’s YOU who are putting your head in the lion’s mouth.

The “castle doctrine” should not (and does not) shelter you from confrontations that you cause. This dips*** deserved the asswhipping he was about to get, and if these circumstances aren’t a case for a jury, nothing is.