Replies

I agree that you are summarizing the most significant aspect of this. There sre many possibilities about why this happened, but the reasons for it happening are of lesser importance than the absolute disaster that has constituted the entirety of the administration reaction. If the administration were wearing the R jerseys this would be in the constant negative news cycle all the way up to the election. IMHO this is a wide-spreading viewpoint, or at least it should be.

There is a definite coverup. The WH knew there was an
attack coming. When the video showed up, they figured
they had the perfect out.

But why the coverup (which the pubs are scared to say so)?
To me it’s obvious. If the news got out that the WH knew
that an attack was coming, how could Obama defend why the
US didn’t take steps to protect the murdered four. If he
tried to wiggle by saying we didn’t have enough warning
soon enough. Then he leaves himself vulnerable that his
Intelligence is P/P.

Obama chose to lie rather than tell the truth which the
media would help him by soft coating the fact.

But we are talking 4, repeat 4, murders. To me he is
guilty because regardless of warning, that Embassy needed
more protection. Libya was a powder keg. We has just
bombed them with hundreds of sorties over several months.