You seem to have an issue with the "wealthy" as you intentionally differentiate them from others -that is what drew me to your comments that premise a LEFTIST class warfare meme. You can not have class warfare without at first dividing up into classes.
REGRESSIVE -you no like? translates into PROGRESSIVE -you like?
Again there is no wealth tax -ONLY if one takes an inheritance as income is it taxed. AND as I stated -I would suggest that reducing taxes is always good.
Given your knowledge of our current tax structure, I'll give your opinion all the consideration it is due.
Given your objections and your arguments it appears you think income taxes are good, they should be progressive; and the wealthy should pay more. You promote leftist redistribution probably without realizing you do -you sure as hell argue for it.
What part of equality under the rule law do you not get and why do you dislike the "wealthy"?
Another idiot incapable of seeing outside the Hegelian dialectic to which he has been conditioned. You said there were no wealth taxes. I not only showed you one, and a biggie, but a wealth tax that hits conservatives disproportionately, allowing the super-rich leftists (fascists actually, you know, the people who sponsor the regulations squeezing landowners and small business people... those guys, but I digress) allowing the super-rich leftists to clean up for pennies on the dollar (which they always do after a collapse they've engineered). Simply because they have money, you come running to the rescue, blathering the usual class warfare crap. I'm talking legal inequities that are structured by wealth level. They are regressive. You don't get it.
So the rest of your drivel is equally senseless. It is neither politically nor economically sound, but scads of metrics. Unless you shape up, I'm done with your stupidity.