Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Obama May Need a Reagan Comeback
Rasmussen Reports ^ | Friday, October 05, 2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 10/06/2012 2:43:10 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: presidio9
"Finally, even Rasmussen is effectively conceeding that Ohio is a toss-up, and that is really the only vote that counts in this election."

I'm starting to think the only reason they are saying it's close so we keep watching. Hussein screwed the pooch, but good. In front of some 70 Million viewers, no less. Does anyone believe the next debates will have 2/3's that many viewers?

21 posted on 10/06/2012 3:23:37 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I agree. Unless Romney has a major stumble, this election is going our way. The emperor has no clothes, and all could see on Wednesday night. He likely will do better next time, but I have to assume Romney will be just as prepared and just as sharp, and it will be a reminder of his performance this week. Obama will likely land some nice punches since it will be all on the line next time.

Before then, voters will also see Romney’s stellar vp selection, and another contrast will be drawn. A superstar vs a hack has-been. Who made the better vp choice? It will further cement Romney’s leadership.


22 posted on 10/06/2012 3:23:55 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Fortunately, Romney and Ryan are not pot smoking lazy a$$e$ like their opposition. I am sure that neither will be resting on their laurels. Regardless of manipulated unemployment figures; Obama still has no record to stand on all he has in these debates is negative attacks on Romney which were shown to be ineffective. It is very good for Obama that he didn't use the “47%” comment; I am sure Romney was hoping for that one and had an aggressive return planned that we would have caused Chris Mathews head to explode.
23 posted on 10/06/2012 3:25:11 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
He was awarded the presidency of the Harvard Law Review based upon melanin.

Wishful thinking on your part. His skin color may have helped him get into the school. The Law Review is a cutthroat business. I am paraphrasing an earlier point by Laura Ingraham.

He has never before gone against an aggressive, skilled debater. He is the AZ Cardinals offensive line of debaters.

Do you mean "other than Hillary Clinton & John Edwards?" The measure of a debater's skill is not whether you (an admittedly biased conservative) agree with them. It is whether they can sway public opinion. Obama may be out of practice, he may have the facts against him here, but he is still a VERY effective public speaker. And we certainly have not heard the last of him.

To play along with your football reference, you are starting to sound a bit like the New England Patriots before last year's Super Bowl.

24 posted on 10/06/2012 3:26:06 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Can you imagine what that debate must have done to Bobo's self-confidence? It's like a boxer who has risen to the top on the basis of bouts he didn't know were fixed all of a sudden going against a skilled professional. And he is facing the same opponent in two more fights!!!

I can relate to that through my own life experience. When I was a boy around 12 years old, I used to play baseball with other kids on my street, most of them two or three years younger than me. I quickly became the star of my neighborhood "sandlot" team. Every time I came to bat, the outfielders would respectfully back up to the fence of the tiny field we played on and they would try to pitch around me.

It didn't take long for my little 12-year-old head to swell up and I thought I was the second coming of Babe Ruth.

The following spring, I went to Little League tryouts and when I came to bat, the pitcher whizzed the ball right by me. Before I even started swinging, the ball was already popping into the catchers glove. I had never seen a fastball before!. I took about 15 pitches and I think I foul tipped one of them before the coaches told me to move on and brought the next kid up. Needless to say, I never got called back and those were the days where you either made the team or you sat home.

It was a humiliating experience but I realized that having 9 and 10 year old neighborhood kids lobbing balls at me did not compare to a 13 year old Little Leaguer with a decent fastball.

I guess this is a lesson that Obama had to learn late in life.

25 posted on 10/06/2012 3:28:16 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
he is still a VERY effective public speaker.

He is a teleprompter reader.

26 posted on 10/06/2012 3:32:20 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The first debate was more than a turn-around. It was a tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Scott, are you kidding me? Obama could never resemble Reagan in any way. It is hopeless for the nasty little gay communist. LOL


27 posted on 10/06/2012 3:32:38 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
He is a teleprompter reader.

Again, he will do just fine in the townhall format, where the primary objective is to feel the questioner's pain.

28 posted on 10/06/2012 3:34:13 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The horrible debate performance and the fact that even some on the MSM are puzzled by the weird unemployment numbers (which contradicts the U6 number, which shows the number of combined unemployed, underemployed and those no longer in the job market has not changed from the previous month) is why Obama is taking a beating PR-wise. Americans now know the truth....
29 posted on 10/06/2012 3:37:59 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Again, he will do just fine in the townhall format, where the primary objective is to feel the questioner's pain.

That being said, I have a feeling that Mittens will do surprisingly well there too. I can't think of another Republican who has bought into the whole "Compasionate Conservatism" thing harder.

30 posted on 10/06/2012 3:38:16 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I guess this is a lesson that Obama had to learn late in life.

Would you want to be the one to tell him he isn't as good as he thinks? Look at his excuse making. HE BELIEVES HIS OWN PR.

He is busy memorizing some zingers while his toadies in and out of the media are publicly leaning on the moderators to fight for him. Look for the questions to be liberal talking point accusations and for the moderators to get into arguments with the pub debaters with the goal of either steering the debate to Bobo's advantage or making the pubs look petty.

31 posted on 10/06/2012 3:39:14 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The first debate was more than a turn-around. It was a tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I am laughing so hard at the panic on the left. Most of us have known the empty high chair was a fraud from day 1.


32 posted on 10/06/2012 3:40:00 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Again, he will do just fine in the townhall format, where the primary objective is to feel the questioner's pain.

That was Bubba's special skill. Bobo will ramble on through many different subject areas until the audience is asleep. The danger to the pubs is not Bobo. The dangers to the pubs are Democrat plants in the audience and Democrat moderators.

33 posted on 10/06/2012 3:41:56 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The first debate was more than a turn-around. It was a tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
even some on the MSM are puzzled by the weird unemployment numbers (which contradicts the U6 number, which shows the number of combined unemployed, underemployed and those no longer in the job market has not changed from the previous month)

I understand that. You understand that. The story that filters down to Johnny Lunchbucket is that the rate is going down.

The GOP response to this should not be to quibble with numbers, but to double down on offense: "You are PROUD of 7.8% unemployment after 44 months and $3trillion in borrowed stimulus money? Really???"

34 posted on 10/06/2012 3:42:05 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Do you remember the phony townhall debate between Hillary and Obama in Las Vegas? Neither Hillary nor Obama were willing to do a debate without approving the questions. So, they each brought out their personal union supporters, who read questions that were typed up and handed out before the debate.

Obama gave away the plan by greeting the head of the SEIU Kitchen workers by name.


35 posted on 10/06/2012 3:45:17 PM PDT by Eva (Obama and Hillary lied, Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I also think that Romney is well-aware of the pitfalls of the “townhall” debate format and probably has done simulated debates where essentially every questioner is Left-leaning; he can certainly call on a lot of younger people—including his own sons!—to do a perfect simulation of what an all-Left audience will be like.


36 posted on 10/06/2012 3:45:39 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
I am laughing so hard at the panic on the left.

They are laughable. They spent every dime they had constructing a caricature of Romney and he blew it up in 90 minutes.

37 posted on 10/06/2012 3:45:57 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The first debate was more than a turn-around. It was a tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
The dangers to the pubs are Democrat plants in the audience and Democrat moderators.

I think both of those are givens, but see my earlier point about Mittens being sort of a darkhorse in this format.

38 posted on 10/06/2012 3:46:17 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
That was Bubba's special skill. Bobo will ramble on through many different subject areas until the audience is asleep.

BTW, Obama was able to out-Bubba Mrs. Clinton in the townhall format, but he couldn't keep up with John Edwards.

On the other hand, Casey Anthony could probably beat Hillary Clinton in a townhall debate.

39 posted on 10/06/2012 3:49:55 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I don’t agree with your assessment of Obama’s advantage in the town hall format. Whenever he is forced to interact with a lowly commoner the man looks excruciatingly uncomfortable. He attempts to make small talk and ends up just sounding like a dork. Let’s face it, the guy is no Bill Clinton.


40 posted on 10/06/2012 3:49:58 PM PDT by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson