Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2012 6:09:08 AM PDT by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nhwingut
Are You More Employed Than You Were 4 Years Ago?

You might be working two or three jobs, thanks to the President...

2 posted on 10/06/2012 6:12:16 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

Part time doesnt pay enough to support a person..and we didnt create enough jobs to make the figures match with jobs lost so whats up?


3 posted on 10/06/2012 6:13:57 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

the job numbers are a blatant out and out pile


4 posted on 10/06/2012 6:24:59 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut
You can't have less unemployment without less people on the government dole.

The 7.8% unemployment numbers should also reflect that less people are on the government dole therefore reducing the 47% who are living on welfare, food stamps, dependent on government.

6 posted on 10/06/2012 6:36:22 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut
Romney all but ignored the positive jobs numbers while campaigning Friday night in Florida, instead highlighting his strong debate performance . . .

I guess they missed Mitt's response about how his policies will result in low unemployment due to the creation of jobs vs. Zero's policies which "reduce" it due to people giving up and dropping out of the job market.

I can hear a future debate where Mitt schools Zero again by explaining that adding milli9ons to the Food Stamp program and to SSI disability roles does not jibe with an improving jobs market...

7 posted on 10/06/2012 6:44:00 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

‘Positive job numbers’... Canada, with roughly a 10th of your population created 52,000 jobs in September... That is a positive job number. If that number had been 5,200 jobs and our media tried to claim that it was ‘positive’, there would be riots in the streets. LOL


8 posted on 10/06/2012 7:38:21 AM PDT by jerod (Pro-Abortion Gun Control Freaks & Environmental Nuts who hated Capitalism? The Nazi's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

133,561,000 workers Jan 2009
133,500,000(P) workers Sept 2012
Total Non Farm Payroll Seasonal Adjusted
Bureau of Labor Statistics

http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=CE_cesbref1


9 posted on 10/06/2012 8:23:46 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (ZERO DARK THIRTY (coming soon to an embassy near you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nhwingut

Obama will have to have the skill to articulate EXACTLY which of his policies or actions have created which jobs and how that was done and how it looks moving into the future. Otherwise it is just a fluke or a lie to say that “THE ECONOMY” (define that too) is going in the right direction. Without specifics it means nothing.


10 posted on 10/06/2012 9:58:31 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (ENVY IS JUST PASSIVE, LAZY GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson