Romney's Playbook

Denver — The elements of Mitt Romney’s Rocky Mountain rout were hatched weeks ago in Vermont’s Green Mountains. In early September, Romney slowed down his campaign schedule and retreated with a small group of advisers to the home of Kerry Healey, his former lieutenant governor. Ohio senator Rob Portman, a trusted ally, joined Stuart Stevens, Eric Fehrnstrom, Bob White, and a handful of other Romney confidants. They spent days holding mock debates, and nights reviewing President Obama’s stylistic tics. When they needed a break, they roamed around Healey’s secluded estate, which is 100 miles south of Burlington, Vt. But mostly they talked, over hot chocolate and coffee, about how best to communicate Romney’s message.

Portman says Romney’s willingness to fully commit to the prep was striking. Day after day, he’d get up early, exercise, and then join the team for hours of work. Advisers certainly played a role, but according to Portman, it was the candidate who drove his advisers. Even when he had a busy week of campaigning, Romney would always find time to study or hold a brief mock debate. “It was all him,” Portman tells me. “Honestly, I’ve spent a lot of time with Mitt Romney for the past month or so, and what I saw on stage is who he is. He’s smart, he’s articulate, and he’s got a big heart.”

During the opening prep sessions, the group quickly came to a consensus: At the podium, Romney would be forceful, nearly as assertive as he was in Healey’s living room. His advisers have always admired Romney’s ability to peel apart arguments in private, and they encouraged him to do the same at the debate, with a little polish. The goal was to overwhelm the president with liveliness and information, to force him to confront the messy details of his economic and fiscal record. The strategy, sources say, clicked with Romney for two reasons: He did not want to spend hours tinkering with his mannerisms, and he wanted to focus on internalizing data. He’d take advice on his voice, his posture, and the rest, but he wanted his prep time to be a policy workshop.

“This whole thing about ‘zingers,’ I never even heard that word discussed in debate prep,” Stevens says. “If you go back to the history and look at Governor Romney’s 20 debates, he likes policy, he likes substance, and he likes strong arguments that are based on merits and on differences. He’s never been one for debate tricks and sleight of hand.”

During the mock debates, Portman engaged Romney as if they were testy undergraduates at the Oxford Union. Portman, acting as Obama, hammered Romney on every part of his agenda, sometimes to the point of belittling him. “I’ve never seen Rob Portman lose a mock debate,” Stevens says. “He’s undefeated — but he cheats. He knows the questions and has notes.” (Stevens and Portman both advised George W. Bush before debates.) On September 6, as he visited a hardware store, Romney told reporters that Portman was getting under his skin. “I’m just glad I won’t be debating Rob Portman in the final debates,” Romney said, smiling. “He’s good.”

The practice made a difference. One longtime Romney friend tells me that Romney markedly improved throughout September as he devoted himself to his briefing books and the mock debates. The friend says Romney didn’t think of the debate as a political dialogue but as a grueling, 90-minute competition that demanded discipline. He prepared in the same way he used to review pending business deals at Bain Capital: He challenged his closest advisers about the most minor points, he spent a lot of time reading, and he constantly bantered with his aides about the other side’s weaknesses and strengths.

Romney’s approach slightly diverged from his campaign’s day-to-day operation, which has seized on Obama’s verbal stumbles. Romney didn’t want to sound canned, he wanted to sound informed, so he kept a few lines he liked from prep, such as “trickle-down government,” but decided against quoting Obama’s gaffes. It was about seeming competent and presidential under the bright lights. He’d leave the gotcha games for his rapid-response squad. “We didn’t talk about the ‘private sector is doing fine,’ nor did we talk about ‘he built it,’ nor did we talk about the vice president saying the middle class has been buried,” Stevens says.

To Stevens, Romney’s best moments were when he showcased his comfort with his gubernatorial record in Massachusetts, especially on education, and when he spoke about Obama’s failed green-energy initiatives. In a rare one-liner, Romney quipped that the president “picks losers” like Solyndra. Stevens says the “losers” passage was indicative of Romney’s ability to be snappy but not snippy. He’d lead with something sharp and follow with a couple of meaty paragraphs. “They were big, substantive moments that speak to who Mitt Romney really is,” Stevens says.

The little things mattered, too. Romney’s team wanted a dash of heart to go along with the punches. His researchers carefully culled more than a dozen anecdotes from the trail about people who were struggling in the Obama economy, and his policy aides provided examples of the Obama administration’s bureaucratic blunders. Ed Gillespie, Peter Flaherty, and Beth Myers, who are all political advisers, kept tabs on the sessions and offered candid takes on Romney’s points and his exchanges with Portman. They talked about the primary debates, devised better ways to approach the moderator (don’t back down, but don’t ramble on about the rules), and offered advice on what to do when your opponent is speaking (less note-taking, more direct eye contact).

Outside of Romney’s tight-knit inner circle, few Republicans were expecting him to come out fighting. They knew he was intelligent, but they didn’t know if he would be able to easily repel the president’s attacks. They worried that he might get rattled. One prominent Romney backer, however, predicted that Romney would impress. Chris Christie, the pugnacious New Jersey governor, told CBS News on Sunday that Romney would be effective. “This whole race is going to be turned upside down,” he said. “Thursday morning, you’re all going to be scratching your heads and saying ‘Wow, we’re going to have a barn burner for the next 33 days.’”

Christie, who has casually advised Romney before previous debates, was greeted with skepticism from many pundits, who thought that he was unreasonably raising expectations. Fehrnstrom, for his part, didn’t mind the comments. “He’s quite the prognosticator,” Fehrnstrom says as we chat outside the debate hall. On Sunday, Christie may have sounded off-key to outsiders, but those inside Romney World have known for weeks that their candidate was ready. As they see it, Romney’s latest ascent didn’t start on Wednesday. It started after the conventions at a mountain lodge in New England.

One thing I don’t like about Romney was his “I was wrong” re the 47% remark. As Rush said, all Romney had to say about that was, “If you want to go into old tapes, let’s look at some of my opponents old tapes”.

— but he [debating partner Portman] cheats. He knows the questions and has notes.”

You play like you practice. You have to assume that Obama's sycophants in the press will leak the questions to him, so you have to practice like that's going to happen.

Wow. What strikes me most about that picture are two things: The smug, condescending smirk, and the body posture.

When I was a kid, my dad would have told me to wipe that smirk off of my face.

As the electorate, I hope we can tell him the same thing. What a loser.

This is an excellent article.

Romney's love of hard work and preparation is why Obama will never win a debate...even if the moderators try to help him.

Obama doesn't work hard because everything has always been handed to him on a silver platter. It's not in his nature to succeed when hard work is required...to succeed against a guy like Romney.

That picture reminds me of Ray Charles. Ray was blind but a great talent. Obama my not be physical blind but he is Deaf, Dumb and Blind to the greatness of America and so are Obama voters.

I must admit I felt that Romney was foisted upon us and this rankled me for many reasons. But the man really impressed me at the convention and the more I hear him speak the more I like him. I still have issues and thought he’d let us down at the debates. Clearly I don’t know the man and have underestimated him. Now I wonder by how much?

Here's another area where Obama is going to have trouble...

Ed Gillespie, Peter Flaherty, and Beth Myers, who are all political advisers, kept tabs on the sessions and offered candid takes on Romney’s points and his exchanges with Portman.

Best I can tell, Obama doesn't take advice...he only gives it.

There is a deeper symbolism here, that Obama may have wanted to use, but now the opportunity is lost. (And Romney could have creamed him on it anyway)

Obama has used the Hoover dam in his speeches several times, as an example of big government doing economically good things during hard times. Hoover dam was built during the depression, and is very successful in providing water to the western states. The news article accompanying the picture states when he was in Las Vegas studying for the debate and learned the Hoover dam was so close to the city, he wanted to go see it.

In the debate he could have tried to use his trip as a segue into big government helping out, but now it is just a symbol if him playing hooky and getting out of studying.

And even if that didn't happen, he still would have been creamed if he compared his administration to building the Hoover dam, because the Hoover dam is economically productive, and he has spent the last four years, in a recession, destroying over a hundred dams to make way for fish migration.

Wow. Why did McCain win the nomination four years ago? I forget.

I’ll be proud to vote for a guy who prepares effectively to succeed in his job.

He looks like he will actually enjoy doing presidential things, like hiring Cabinet members, hashing out the budget and negotiating on legislation, meeting foreign leaders, etc. What a relief this will be.

Zingers are important. Zingers and trivia is what stays in people’s minds and what, I think, can sway them. Remember “There you go again?” Well, there you go again. From this debate I remember the 716 billion taken out of Medicare. I remember it because Romney repeated it several times. I wish he had risen to the occasion when Obumster mentioned Exxon Mobil, and educated the stupid voters about how the Federal government gets several times more than Exxon for no work whenever you buy a gallon of gas (cite figures here.) That would have been repeated at the water coolers, like the trivia spoken by football commentators on Sundays get repeated on Mondays. People are swayed by factoids, fact of life, sad maybe but factual.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.