Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

My husband said Jack Welch was all over Twitter and CNBC this morning, outraged at the FAKE 7.8% unemployment number...

24 posted on 10/05/2012 10:52:00 AM PDT by nutmeg (I'm with Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz: Romney / Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg

BTTT


26 posted on 10/05/2012 11:42:13 AM PDT by nutmeg (I'm with Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz: Romney / Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg; All
Here's a more accurate take on all of this:
Friday, October 5, 2012
Economics, Pethokoukis

The sickly, stagnant September jobs report

romerbernsteinSeptember2012

Is this the Obama October Surprise?

Only in an era of depressingly diminished expectations could the September jobs report be called a good one. It really isn’t. Not at all.

1. Yes, the U-3 unemployment rate fell to 7.8%, the first time it has been below 8% since January 2009. But that’s only due to a flood of 582,000 part-time jobs. As the Labor Department noted:

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) rose from 8.0 million in August to 8.6 million in September. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.

2. And take-home pay? Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have risen by just 1.8 percent. When you take inflation into account, wages are flat to down.

3. The broader U-6 rate — which takes into account part-time workers who want full-time work and lots of discouraged workers who’ve given up looking — stayed unchanged at 14.7%. That’s a better gauge of the true unemployment rate and state of the American labor market.

 

4. The shrunken workforce remains shrunken. If the labor force participation rate was the same as when President Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.7%. If the participation rate had just stayed steady since the start of the year, the unemployment rate would be 8.4% vs. 8.3%. Where’s the progress? Here is RDQ Economics:

*snip*

.

Bottom line: The U.S. labor market remains in a deep depression with virtually no recovery since the official end of the Great Recession. But the Long Recession continues unabated.

 

More at The Link
27 posted on 10/05/2012 11:45:39 AM PDT by Syncro (The Tea Party is Dead!--MSM/Dems LONG LIVE THE TEA PARTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


29 posted on 10/05/2012 8:51:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

thanks for the ping


30 posted on 10/05/2012 10:26:53 PM PDT by GOPJ (You only establish a feel for the line by having crossed it. - - Freeper One Name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Your husband was right! Welch’s tweet was da’ bomb! It got the whole country talking!

Somehow, I don’t think the new unemployment # will help the O, at all.

Next up...the Ryan / Biden debate.

As I saw one dem operator say, they are stuck in Debateland until the election. Not a good place for them to be.


31 posted on 10/06/2012 12:38:50 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (~~~RAGE ~~~ I haz it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson