Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long

I’m amazed that 70 million tuned in for a debate last night in a race the media had all but declared over.


22 posted on 10/04/2012 10:03:54 PM PDT by kristinn (Dump the Chump in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: kristinn

What amazes me is that even the 2008 election when everybody fawned over Obama did not have this many viewers. I mean....just wow...


24 posted on 10/04/2012 10:18:49 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

And this is a good point I noticed on another site, but the first debate is the most important. Even if Obama were to “win” later, there will probably be fewer viewers.

More importantly, however, is the fact that Obama really wants podiums at debates. He prefers the traditional format, but the next debate will be a mixture of foreign/domestic policy and be in a town hall format.

It will be very hard for Obama to be tough on Romney without appearing like an ass in a town hall style venue.

And the final debate will be just foreign policy, likely meaning even fewer viewers.

If Obama did decide to hold back last night, it may have been a fatal error for him.


26 posted on 10/04/2012 10:21:59 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson