SAN FRANCISCO: Nudists uncover the city's outrage

San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/4/12 | C.W. Nevius

[dead]

The proper libertarian response would be, “You own your property - go be naked on your property. You don’t own the public square, and the majority of those who do, have the right to set standards for its use. Put some pants on or leave.”

[tacticalogic]

Any libertarians here going to weigh in to defend this “victimless crime?”

Do you want them to?

[fwdude]

I just want them to be consistently honest, so that their warped philosophy is exposed.

[Uncle Chip]

How is this not a public health issue???

[hattend]

"I walk all over the place nude," he said. "The most common reaction is oblivious."

Probably because anybody complaining will be arrested by the SF PC police.

Used to be a great city...too bad.

[SmithL]

"It's like you're a bad liberal," said Wiener. "You feel guilty about it."

Yeah, a bad liberal!

[tacticalogic]

I just want them to be consistently honest, so that their warped philosophy is exposed.

Would it be okay if they lie, but still look warped?

[tacticalogic]

I just want them to be consistently honest, so that their warped philosophy is exposed.

Would it be okay if they lie, but still look warped?

[upcountryhorseman]

People ought to have a choice what their eyes gaze at: eapecially at dinner time, lunch time, breakfast. Does anyone think, anymore, that this is a problem for children?