Posted on 10/04/2012 6:22:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
No doubt. My point was that the same figures would have been manipulated with a different formula to hurt Repubs.
The response is: He plans to cut rates across the board, and cap deductions — he talked about an aggregate cap on deductions, not eliminating deductions. Many in the middle class, esp. in the lower middle class, will not be affected by the cap on deductions, but will still see their rates, and thus their taxes drop. The cap on deductions will mostly prevent upper income earners from shielding their income from taxation.
As an aside, I’d prefer a more radical version of Romney’s idea: a cap on the amount of personal income excluded from taxation at the normal rates by any means (though obviously business expenses would remain fully deductible, since only the profit, not the revenue is actually income and I’d leave charitable contributions uncapped — we need to support the civil society, the ‘space between government and the individual’), I’d apply the cap to the total amount of deductions (other than charitable contributions and business expenses), plus tax exempt income, plus the amount of tax credits divided by the taxpayer’s marginal rate, plus the amount effectively shielded from taxation by favorable lower tax rates on classes of income (I don’t feel like working out the formula this morning).
Exactly-— 100%
LOL!!!
After last night I think the Obama “base” has shrunk a bit
The base for Romney has been energized bigtime.
I just contributed to campaign Mittens this morning...never thought that would happen in a million years.
***the real loser was the MSM. They were exposed as complete sycophants.***
Watch for them to turn on him. They now smell blood in the water.
I actually thought the exchange where Obama charged Romney with not being Specific was one of the key ones of the night.
Romney's reply was basically "I am not required to be specific, as President I will say 'this is what I want to do' and then will sit down with congress and figure out the best way to do it."
I hope you’re right. If so, that means the pollsters will have to do even more oversampling of Dems.
Thanks for the good laugh this morning, I find that picture very funny. You could use many captions with it or nothing at all. Thanks again.
Thanks-I am better debating conservative principles and social issues. Taxes/numbers are harder for me to grasp and thus debate.
Windows in office building no longer open.
Guess why?
People who were planning to vote for Obama are not going to change their minds, and in fact many of them are claiming that Obama won the debate, and that Romney told a bunch of lies, irrational as it might sound, but they are irrational people. Therefore, I dont think the debate will have much, if any, effect on the election.
&&&
Exactly. As I said on another thread, I cannot believe any more than 20-80 voters changed their minds because of the debate. The percentage of 0bama voters who even watched was probably 10% or less.
This in the New York Times? Very damning statement about a president. Perhaps he knows something the rest of us only suspect?
It depends on what "getting a tax break" means. I think what Obama is saying is that the taxes overseas are lower than in the US, so it's attractive for businesses to move overseas. So, he's going to save jobs by raising taxes? Maybe save jobs overseas, but not in the United States.
Bingo..the only thing MORE important to the MSM than their ideology is their vanity..the need to seem correct on all things...it will become very difficult for them in the next few weeks to continue the fiction that Obama’s win in inevitable..
I can’t remember where I read it, but I always loved this exchange:
“What kind of obsequious sychophant are you?”
“What kind of obsequious sychophant would you like me to be?”
I stole it off of Facebook....feel free to use and post everywhere!
Yes. Expect the Middle East to blow up sometime in the next few weeks.
This is the first time most American voters got to see Romney unfiltered and not just being attacked in the press or lied about in a 30 second attack ad. Most people liked what they saw; a presidential looking man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.