Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi

from the article, permits aside.

This is an improper taking without compensation. It is not that the pool is on a wetland but that it is toooooo close to a wetland. so the goverment can set aside an area and then take via policy rather than law without compensation.


36 posted on 10/03/2012 9:19:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

If it has a conservation easment than somebody has already been compensated.


39 posted on 10/03/2012 9:46:38 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Ignorance is bliss- I'm stoked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory
This is an improper taking without compensation.

Sure it is. They made his hose worthless. Maybe they can make up for it by assessing it higher for next years taxes.

42 posted on 10/03/2012 9:51:37 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson