Posted on 10/02/2012 1:24:34 PM PDT by AmonAmarth
Edited on 10/02/2012 3:49:44 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Sorry to say the only thing that will detract from this video will be S Hannity saying the same thing over and over again, talking over every guest, beating every horse to death with run on nonquestions.
Otherwise he’s ok.
Bad, very bad for Obama, since his true self, which he is racist.
One thing for sure - young folk do not like phonies. He has to be a huge phony to SOMEONE based on what he said - either to the african american obamaphoners or the middle-of-the-road purple staters. There can be no obamafuscation over that.
Well I post the Hannity thread, so I do keep track on what is going on with his show.
OK, I’m confused (& little late to the game on this thread so forgive) but the video in question & one Drudge is hinting at has been out there..also, doesn’t match the hints from Drudge about poor people, highways out in the suburbs etc..is Drudge possibly teasing with the photo, headfake?? & this bombshell video is new?
Obama hates the suburbs and wants to eliminate the middle class. It’s the only way for the left, for democrats.
People really going to accept him calling for investment in “OUR” neighborhoods and not in the suburbs?
Okay. Got it. :-)
Yes.
maybe even some of the middle aged to seniors who are yellow-dog Dem’s might even take exception to his hateful speech IF they happen to hear it somewhere, hopefully Super PAC commercials . . . they’ve got their kids, grandkids and great-grandkids to consider. Urban vs. suburban won’t be pretty.
Possible as Breitbart.com a few weeks ago offered a $100,000 reward for a copy of the Khalidi tape.
Most of the 47% will simply “stay home” on Election Day.
Unless the video in question & one that I watched had more to it?
why bad for romney?
That's very true, and I give him a lot of credit for that. But Wright basically made a fool of him when he had him on the show to talk about "Black Liberation" theology. Hannity didn't really know squat about it. He apparently had no idea at the time that it was even communist in nature. He still barely ever mentions it.
"Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal".--James (Jim) Cone,
African American Religious Thought: An Anthology (Paperback)
by Cornel West (Editor), Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (Editor)
__________________________________
SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"
WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.
HANNITY: But I'm a reverend
WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354158,00.html
____________________________________________
Obama's Church: Gospel of Hate
Kathy Shaidle, FrontPageMag.com
Monday, April 07, 2008
In March of 2007, FOX News host Sean Hannity had engaged Obamas pastor in a heated interview about his Churchs teachings. For many viewers, the ensuing shouting match was their first exposure to "Black Liberation Theology"...
Like the pro-communist Liberation Theology that swept Central America in the 1980s and was repeatedly condemned by Pope John Paul II, Black Liberation Theology combines warmed-over 1960s vintage Marxism with carefully distorted biblical passages. However, in contrast to traditional Marxism, it emphasizes race rather than class. The Christian notion of "salvation" in the afterlife is superseded by "liberation" on earth, courtesy of the establishment of a socialist utopia.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=30CD9E14-B0C9-4F8C-A0A6-A896F0F44F02
____________________________________________
Catholics for Marx [Liberation Theology]
By Fr. Robert Sirico
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, June 03, 2004
In the days when the Superpowers were locked in a Cold War, Latin America seethed with revolution, and millions lived behind an iron curtain, a group of theologians concocted a novel idea within the history of Christianity. They proposed to combine the teachings of Jesus with the teachings of Marx as a way of justifying violent revolution to overthrow the economics of capitalism.
The Gospels were re-rendered not as doctrine impacting on the human soul but rather as windows into the historical dialectic of class struggle. These "liberation theologians" saw every biblical criticism of the rich as a mandate to expropriate the expropriating owners of capital, and every expression of compassion for the poor as a call for an uprising by the proletarian class of peasants and workers.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=460782B7-35CC-4C9E-A2C5-93832067C7CD
I don’t think some of the 47% will take too kindly to being told they don’t know how to dress, how to shop, how to act in an office like they are pond scum.
Oh yeah, and get ready for 30 days of a detailed ANAL EXAMINATION of Mormon history and views of “persons of color”. Now that the dogs of war have been released evil will “unleash Hell”. I can hear the Nazgul wail...
Yesterday, I was driving to town; I turned on the radio and Hannity was parroting his well-used "Democrats say Republicans want dirty air and water" line.
Last night, my husband turned on Fox; Sean was interviewing Schwarzenegger. I yelled from the kitchen, "Republicans want dirty air and water!", and half a second later, Hannity said it AGAIN.
Who is going to hear it? The MSM will need “confirmation” that the voice is actually Obama. It will take them weeks and only then (after November 6th) will they determine that yes, it is Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.