Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol
If there is someone on the payroll who has a history of drug use, and if the plaintiff finds out about them, then the company is automatically at fault because the employee “could have” caused the issue with the defective product / service.

Sounds fishy to me - can you cite a single specific instance of such a finding of fault?

You obviously have a fight to pick and are looking for someone to fight with. Not me - I dont have a dog in this fight.

Your dog is your still unsupported claim about legal fault.

Of your three links, the first two say nothing about legal fault and the third says nothing about drug use - so no support there for your claim.

140 posted on 10/01/2012 1:33:09 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: JustSayNoToNannies

I assume you know the difference between OPINION which I was providing and FACT which I never claimed to provide. Please feel free to form your own opinion and conduct your own research and obtain your own education.


145 posted on 10/01/2012 1:54:17 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson