This is bleak. Rasmussen is the best and he has Obama at 50%. 50% means it makes zero difference how the undecideds break.
More than anything else, though, this says that Romney’s invisible campaign strategy is not working.
No way this economy, this foreign policy, this jobs data, and this distrust of America’s direction should have the guy responsible for that leading in a campaign for the presidency.
I’m in Ohio and I see/hear Obama ads regularly and seldom run across a Mitt ad. Someone explain that to me. The “keeping my powder” dry strategy was supposed to end with the Dem Convention. Are we now waiting for the first debate? After that will be await the 2nd?
This non-strategy should make ABOs who felt obligated to turn to Romney for the sake of their nation livid.
“I’m in Ohio and I see/hear Obama ads regularly and seldom run across a Mitt ad.”
Republican columnist Mona Charen says the same thing in Virginia:
“I live in Virginia, the swingiest of swing states. I expected that by now we’d be deluged with ads from both sides. But I’ve seen just two Romney ads.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/328853/romney-campaign-ads-mona-charen