Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

Well Rasmussen’s own Party Affiliation survey for August showed a +4.3% R gap, he never used his own data in his own normalization of the numbers.

In 2006 the dems had a big edge in party affiliation they expanded that gap by ~1.5% in the subsequent election.

In the 2010 midterm the gap in party affiliation was 1.3% R, what has happened to move the needle to the dems by 4%+ ?

Of course he has been getting hammered by Axelrod.

Interesting.


98 posted on 09/29/2012 9:58:12 PM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Leto

First, polling has never been an exact science, far from it.
Modern polling methods started with Gallup in 1936 just in tine for the Roosevelt-Landon election. Gallup picked the winner and embarrassed the Literary Digest out of business.

Yet even back then, Gallup wasn’t accurate. From 1936-1952 they were mediocre to terrible(especially Dewey-Truman in ‘48). From 1956-1976 they were pretty accurate with very good results in 1960 and 1968. However, from 1980-2012 with the exception of 1984 and 2004, they have been simply crap.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx


134 posted on 09/30/2012 3:35:24 AM PDT by princeofdarkness (The Obama Administration is circling the wagons. But the Truth Indians are using flaming arrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson