Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I saw the movie. I wasn’t terribly offended by it. I just thought it was banal. I thought Dafoe’s portayal of Christ was bad. Not because he portrayed Christ as confused, but because Dafoe did a bad acting job.

Personally, I don’t mind fictional movies that might not be biblically correct, but I do mind mindless, poorly done movies that gin up controversy to mask poor writing and acting.


4 posted on 09/28/2012 11:02:12 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Opinionated Blowhard

It was an attempt to counterpoise his religiously themed NYC films like Mean Streets and Taxi Driver...a film with religious figures displaying the attitudes of New Yorkers.


6 posted on 09/28/2012 11:04:26 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

I watched it too and I really don’t remember much about it. Guess it really didn’t make much of an impression on me.

I agree about Defoe. He’s not a very good actor in most movies I’ve seen him in.

I much more prefer The Life of Brian to this one. LOL
But then I am a Monty Python fan.


10 posted on 09/28/2012 1:23:17 PM PDT by History Repeats (Drink plenty of TEA, but avoid the Koolaid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson